What is a Senior Research Project?

At BASIS Tucson, seniors have the chance to propose an independent research project that takes place off campus during the last trimester of the year. The seniors whose proposals are accepted write their own syllabi and then head off into the world, to a site where they conduct their research while interning with a professional in the field. Those of us stuck on campus follow their adventures on this blog. Now that the projects are over, we are all excited to attend their presentations. The schedule is as follows:

Wednesday, May 11, 6-8 PM
at the U of A Poetry Center (environmentalism projects)
Sierra Cordova, Nicole Rapatan, Zobella Vinik and Dany Joumaa (see titles of projects, below)

Saturday, May 14, 10-12 AM
at The Loft Cinema (arts projects)
Clarice Bales, Samone Isom, Josh Waterman and Angelynn Khoo (see titles of projects, below)

Monday, May 16, 6-8 PM
at BioSciences West, Rm. 310, U of A ( U of A projects)
Joseph Tang, Jayanth Ganesan, Andrew Graham and Gabriel Carranza (see titles of projects, below)

Tuesday, May 17, 6-8 PM
at U of A McGuire Center for Entrepreneurship, Blg. MCLND, rm. 207 (travel abroad projects)
Clover Powell, Greg Spell, Agustin Temporini and Margarita Sadova.

We'd love to see you there!



The BASIS Tucson Class of 2011 Senior Research Project bloggers (with the titles of their projects) are:



Clarice Bales: "Narrative and Film"



Sierra Cordova: "The Intent and Application of Environmental Policy"



Clover Powell: "The Artistic Interpretation of the Biological Sciences"



Greg Spell: "Micro-venturing in Guatemala"



Agustin Temporini: "A Study of the Role of the Press in 1960's/70's Argentina"



Gabriel Carranza: "Analysis and Research on Drugs associated with Torsades de Pointes"



Dany Joumaa: "Innovations in Display Technology: Synthesis of Organic Luminescent Materials Compounds"



Joseph Tang: "The Creation and Project of 3D Holograms"



Jayanth Ganesan: "Research of Game Thoeretic Models in relation to Non-Market Games"



Andrew Graham: "The Malaria-Resistant Mosquito"



Samone Isom: "Art and Artist: in peril of Devaluation?"



Angelynn Khoo: "Mousa, Mouseion, Museum: MOCA Tucson"



Nicole Rapatan: "Sustainable Architecture and Design in Modern Times"



Margarita Sadova: "Pulmonology at St. Joseph's Hospital"



Josh Waterman: "The Fiery Crossroads of Artistic Value and Financial Success in the Independent Film Industry"



Zobella Vinik: "Environmental Psychology with the Drachman Institute"







Enjoy the Blog!



















Thursday, April 21, 2011

The Big Crunch

Hello Everybody,

I just finished coding all point-by-point summaries of all table tennis matches that I observed from the 2010 World Table Tennis Championship. Since I had to code the server, direction, court, and game progression (who won the point) for all 1,826 serves. This process took, as expected, a really long time. For the last month, I have been coding all these point-by-point summaries, which is the reason why I haven't posted in a while.

There is good news and bad news. The good news is that after confirming all the data with these point-by-point codes, there are only very slight changes in the overall results of the data. The winning probabilities for serving to either the left or right side are still the same, which is great news. When controlling for Ad and Duece court, there are slight changes to that hypothesis, but I would stress that the difference is VERY slight.

Now, for this to be a comprehensive study, I have to test for the equality of winning probabilities for each player in each match with distribution statistics such as the chi-squared statistic (P-Value), the run test, and the joint statistic test (a combination of the previous two). The bad news is that in an individual table tennis match, there aren't very many serves for any one player (on average, only about 35 per match). It is likely that these statistics will reject the null hypothesis in more matches than expected. However, I can do an Empirical CDF test, which tests for uniformity of P-Values. If I have a uniform distribution of P-Values, I believe that it would okay to assume an equality of winning probabilities. Of course, there aren't enough serves in any individual match to say whether or not there is an asymptotic distribution, which is what the confirmation statistics assume. But studies like these, especially high school studies, are never perfect.

So now it is a big crunch. A big crunch of numbers and a big crunch of work to have a good paper by next Friday. I'll be sure to work hard, because I don't want my presentation to be like a black hole singularity.

Jayanth

No comments: